Mamta's Kitchen - A Family Cookbook





Pressure Cooker size

Return to the forum index.

On 09/12/2012 08:12am, Felafelboy wrote:

I plan on getting another pressure cooker.

The one I currently have is a 4 qt (liter) Fagor Elite (stainless steel)

with a base of a width of about 8 1/2 inches.

I would like to get a larger one, such as a 6 or an 8 qt Fagor

which a store sells with a 2 pressure setting (high at 15 psi and

low at 8 psi).

I mainly use my pressure cooker for cooking brown rice (in a small

bowl sitting on top of a trivet in the cooker), oatmeal, greens,

raw beans, and a few times I've cooked dal. All portion sizes are

one to two servings.

I thought if I got a larger pc, I could use it for more servings of

soup (and making broth), cooking a whole chicken, and turkey drumsticks.

I plan on using the pc to make biryani, and chicken and vegetable stews

also.

Since I am making portion sizes for only one to two servings, would

not an 8 qt cooker be too large to make Indian dishes which is the main

reason why I got the 4 qt cooker in the first place (along with cooking

beans rather than using canned beans)?

I've seen a picture of a 3.5 liter-sized Prestige anodized pressure cooker

and that size impresses me as being ideal for a one serving Indian dish, or

cooking rice directly in the cooker due to its small size. (I use a small

bowl for the rice in my 4 qt cooker due to the width of the base.)

If you were getting a cooker and were planning on mainly using it for smaller servings, but occassionally might want to use it for soups or cooking a whole chicken, would you go for the 6 or 8 qt cooker? (I plan on buying only the Fagor brand. I want stainless steel and a wide base.)

On 09/12/2012 09:12am, AskCy wrote:

Good morning, are you saying you normally only make portions for 2 and you have a 4 litre (4 quart) pressure cooker ? Now you want to make soups/stews in it ? Wouldn't 3 litres of soup be a lot (leaving space in pan)?

Steve

On 09/12/2012 03:12pm, Mamta wrote:

For two people, your pressure cooker should be large enough. Of course it is too small if you want to cook whole chicken etc. in it and a larger cooker may be useful. I tend to cook whole chicken in an oven or a slow cooker.

I have only ever used Prestige, Futura and Hawkins pressure cookers, so am not familiar with the Fagor.

Personally, I don't very often cook rice in a pressure cooker, unless I am cooking a vegetable pilaf and sometimes biryani. All my family in India that cook rice in pressure cooker, cook it directly in the pressure cooker itself, not in a bowl on a trivet. So a 4 litre is ample enough.

My suggestion would be to get your next one larger than you need, since you already have a small one for everyday use. A large one could then be used for whole chicken etc. when you have visitors.

On 09/12/2012 05:12pm, tim wrote:

Can't help on capacity, but I always go for broad rather than deep.

More versatile.

Mine have been Prestige (60+ years ago, with 3 pressures) & Duramatic now.

= tim

On 09/12/2012 06:12pm, Felafelboy wrote:

Regarding the space question for soup ("isn't 3 L enough?) ...

One half of the inner space of the pc is required to be empty, thus the

need for a larger pot for cooking.

I thought it would be useful to be able to make broth quicker than

in a non-pc.

According to a pc website (M...V.....), a 4 qt pc takes a maximum of

8 cups of liquid (with some solids, 10 cups).

Mamta - I understand you don't use a pc for cooking rice.

If you try cooking brown rice in a small bowl (filled with water or

broth, about 1 1/2 to 1 liquid to rice ratio, with a bit of salt),

and cook for 20 minutes, natural release, you may enjoy the chewier texture of the rice. That is, unless you like softer grains.

My concern was using a larger sized container for a smaller (2 serving size)

portion of a subji, stew, or dal and having to "reach down" to scoop out

the dish. Then again, the Fagor pots are wide and generally not as tall

as the Kuhn Rikun design.

I wonder if anyone uses the low pressure settings on their cookers in case

they have the lower pressure option.

On 09/12/2012 09:12pm, Suresh wrote:

surely, soups are simmered, not boiled, and certainly not taken up to the temperatures the pressure cooker gets to?

On 10/12/2012 06:12pm, AskCy wrote:

We've always had "high dome" pressure cookers (Prestige) so you could fill them to nearly the top when making soup etc..

Steve

Return to the forum index.